Four AIs Approved My Fix. None of Them Could Tap the Button.
- #building-in-public
- #ai
- #use-proof
Today an AI wrote a fix, and four more AIs reviewed it, each one reading the change cold, hunting for what the others missed. They were good at it. One caught a mistake that would have quietly wrecked my repo. Another caught a wrong line the first three sailed past. Approved, four times over.
And it still was not done. Because none of them could do the one thing that proves software works: be the person standing there using it.
That is the whole job now. The machines have gotten frighteningly good at the building and the checking. What they cannot do, what they may never do, is stand in for the human the thing is for. They will tell you the code runs. They cannot tell you it helped. They will hand you a clean checkmark all day and never once notice that nobody opened the thing.
So the gap between “the AI says it is done” and “it is actually done” is not closing. It is moving. It used to be: can we build it? Now it is: did a real person use it and feel it work? And only one creature on earth can answer that for my life. Me, with my thumb, on the button.
It is a strange new job description. I did not write this code by hand, and soon I will not review it either. What is left is the part that was always the point: deciding what is worth building, and being the one honest witness that it works. Taste at the front, proof at the back. The machine can carry everything in between.
I almost did not get there today. I tested the wrong copy. I hit a wall, then another. The honest truth of the day was not clever. It was just this: show up, and work until the work is done. Not until it compiles. Not until the robots sign off. Until I use it, and it is real.
The tools are godlike. The proof is still human. That is not a problem to automate away. That is the job, and it is mine.


I am building this in the open. lovelearnlift.com.